FOCL Practice Test

What must accompany Jill's testimony for it to be admissible against Jack in court?

1. It must be recorded on video

2. It must be corroborated by another witness

3. It must be supplemented with other evidence against Jack

4. It must be consistent with police reports

The correct answer is: It must be supplemented with other evidence against Jack

For Jill's testimony to be admissible against Jack in court, it must be supplemented with other evidence that supports her claims. This is crucial because testimony alone may not be sufficient to establish the necessary weight of evidence required for a conviction or legal judgment. When testimony is backed up by additional corroborative evidence—such as physical evidence, documents, or other witness statements—it strengthens the case and provides a more compelling narrative to the court. In many legal contexts, the notion of corroboration is important since it helps to ensure reliability and credibility. Testimony that stands alone can be subject to skepticism, especially if it involves serious allegations or outcomes. Therefore, having supplementary evidence creates a more solid foundation for the testimony, enhancing its impact on the court's decision-making process. Other options mentioned, such as the need for the testimony to be recorded on video or consistent with police reports, do not accurately capture the legal requirement for admissibility. While these factors can contribute to the overall context of the evidence presented, they do not serve as standalone prerequisites for admissibility in the same way that corroborating evidence does.